Not Maine values: Oppose assisted suicide in Maine
by Michael J. Reynolds

This Wednesday, the Maine Legislature will have public hearings on two
nearly identical pieces of legislation dealing with physician assisted
suicide. LD 347 and LD 1066 are versions of the same bill that Maine
voters have consistently said no to as far back as 1995 in the
legislature and by a sizable margin when it went to referendum in
2000. Maine voters have been very consistent in their opposition to
any “death with dignity” bill, and no bill has made it out of the
subcommittee with an “ought to pass” vote. Out of state interests, and
their money, as well as Maine legislators focused on their own
political agendas or fundraising keep this pathetic excuse for a bill
continuously reintroduced, sometimes with different catch phrases, but
with the same deadly intent.

Both bills grant immunity to any physician, provider or person
involved and no criminal penalties are described ineither bill. I find
it rather disturbing that a minor with marijuana in a state where it
is legal would face a larger fine than any medical doctor under this
law.

And “terminally ill” certainly has an interesting definition in LD
347, one that states that a person qualifies for a terminal
prescription if the condition is “an incurable and irreversible
disease that will, within reasonable medical judgment, result in death
in six months.” There is no mention of whether the condition can be
controlled by
medication, nor any exclusion for an individual whose condition can be
controlled by medication. People who have epilepsy, require heart
medication, or even have diabetes could be eligible for assisted
suicide under the proposed language in LD 347. The Oregon Death with
Dignity Act reports include diabetes as an underlying terminal
condition that made patients eligible for a lethal prescription. These
laws undermine the basic values of community, inclusion and diversity
in our state.

In 2016, the Oregon Public Health Division reports also stated that
less than 4% of patients who received a lethal dose of medication were
referred for a psychological evaluation, showing that the risks of
allowing someone with uncontrolled mental illness or depression are
not only potential, but actual in a state where “choice” for
“terminally ill” individuals has been law for twenty years.

Our state has one of the best hospice networks in the nation. Maine
people have fought to give access to much needed palliative care and
therapy, including the use of Medical Cannabis in hospice facilities.
The Maine Medical Cannabis program has helped an untold number of
thousands of Maine individuals,from children to adults receive locally
grown, safely grown and regulated medical marijuana from over two
thousand caregivers or eight dispensaries. Maine has the highest rated
medical marijuana program in the country according to Americans for
Safe Access, a pro-cannabis national nonprofit.

Interestingly, the people who are pushing for passage of this law
point to control and compassion as reasons to support this law, yet
the reality is much more complex than that. Under both proposed laws,
as soon as the prescription is filled, the law is remarkably silent
about the administration of the lethal medication. For anyone who
thinks this will be simply taking a few pills and drifting off to
sleep, that’s not how the process works. According to the Oregon
Public Health Division, the two widely used lethal drugs are
Secobarbital or Pentobarbital. Pentobarbital is currently used in
lethal injection death penalty cases and has become almost impossible
to obtain, making Secobarbital the default drug to “die with dignity.”
When a patient is given a lethal prescription of Secobarbital they are
given 90-100 capsules, told to empty the contents of the capsule in a
sweet tasting liquid, and then drink the liquid. Given the scarcity of
Pentobarbital, the lethal dose of Secobarbital can cost anywhere
from 1,500 to 2,300 dollars.


Finally, in the past few weeks Maine residents and people nationally
have been scared about health care cuts federally, which could deny
people access to health care they need and want. It could also reduce
home care for people with disabilities of all ages who are living in
the community. Context is important and now is not the time to be
discussing this bill. Now is the time we need to tell our legislators
to protect Maine values and say no to LD 347 and LD 1066.


###

Michael Reynolds is a writer and web designer for Ability Maine, a
disability rights website funded by Resources Organizing for Social
Change, a non-profit based in Maine. Reynolds is a long time
disability rights activist and was born with Cerebral Palsy, he lives
in Lewiston.

This piece originally appeared in the Sun Journal on April 2, 2017. A work session is scheduled for April 19th at 1:30 pm.